fiquilts wrote:
I've counted twice and have come up with different numbers, which is why I want to do it again. It would have definitely been easier to count before I started pressing. I had no idea they might be over/under count until I'd already pressed the majority of them. That's about the time I saw the posts of those who were missing some and also others who had too many. I'm sure I'm somewhere between 20 and 30 over, but since they're not in an increment of 28 over, that's why I want to do a third count. Then I'll post for someone who needs more. I received 40+ that had no name or state on them.
Fi
Counting and having to recount is a good indication of what we were going through with 224K+ :shock: :shock: of those little buggers
. Even getting a good grip on them to count and sort wasn't easy. One member sent me a whole box of surgical gloves and a lot of our 'sorter helpers' found those to be very helpful. I thought that was an excellent idea and I'm so glad
she sent them. I used them for everything I counted, so I'm sure none of my counts were incorrect
...ROTFLOL!!!! OK guys...please don't take me seriously with that last statement!
There's no rhyme or reason why some were 20 over, 26 over, 28 over...people were counting in stacks of 28, but occasionally people lost count and those stacks of 28 could have easily become 20, 24, 26, 30, etc. So the increment of 28 really doesn't play too much of a part in the whole scheme of things.
There were also a LOT of members who did not write anything on the HST's at all and when those members sent in 600 or 700, it's easy to understand why a package could have a number with nothing on them. Since it was only a suggestion, I'm guessing that some people did not think it was that important or just didn't have the time to do it.