Wren1010 wrote:
I am rather new to quilting, but I have spent much of my life in the art world. I would love to see some interest and enthusiasm for the subject of art quilts in the forum.
So, my thoughts on Ann's original question... There is a whole section of philosophy (aesthetics) devoted to what is considered art and what is not. There is no firm definition because it is constantly evolving and changing. As an artist, it will be what you decide it is or is not. Not every one will agree either. The Impressionists were quite the renegades of their artistic time because they did not adhere to what was considered proper art . Those rules for the standards of acceptable art were dictated by the formal art salons and the Academie de beaux-arts of their time.
It is quite fine that art can also have function. That is what designers do.
In other words, go for it! LOL!
Wren - thanks for jumping in! I have experienced, and observed, that art quilts can be less than appreciated in the traditional quilt arena. Perhaps it's simply the grey area of definition, or maybe there is some intimidation or even reluctance to change? Quilt guilds can be an example of where there has been apathy and/or criticism. NOT ALL of them
I'm not seeking to be divisive here! I love making traditional quilts, and greatly admire seeing what others have done. I'm often awed to see how someone takes the medium one step further. Embellishment, piecing methods, design, etc. They are ALL art in one sense of the word, right? Any creation is art.
I say hooray for the renegades. Perhaps I am one - or a wannabe. I find myself digging my heels in when, for instance a quilt is observed as not having a "proper" binding. Okay, if you are going to enter it in a competition that has a proper binding as a requirement. But, to me, it sure seems to miss the whole point of the overall beauty or statement or soul of a piece. Those who dare to, for instance, use a facing method on a quilt (which I have done) and/or put yarn on the edge, let alone use raw edge applique' or put found objects (collage) on a quilt, may be the renegades of our time. I say go for it!
I can see that we might be getting into territory of a challenge of defining just what category a quilt falls under, in the instance of a show and/or competition. Is it a functional, bed quilt, or is it a wall quilt/art piece? Is it primarily painted cloth (a'la Hollis Chaterlain). As far as I know, at the present time, the difinition is that the piece requires the three layers (front/batting/back).
More thoughts? Above all, let's be kind in our comments. Haven't we all been to a show and overheard someone saying something like "What IS that **** supposed to be"? Let's do our best to respect others' feelings as well as freedom of speech.
Jan